A great article about Transit Riders Unions in the Atlantic Cities:

https://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/10/does-your-city-need-transit-riders-union/3722/

And another about what really happens when a city makes it transit system free:

https://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2012/10/what-really-happens-when-city-makes-its-transit-system-free/3708/

Last week the Transit Riders Union sent out a short survey on transit funding issues to all candidates for State Legislature positions for King County districts. Below is a link to our letter and survey questions, and links to the responses that have come in so far. Below that is a list of all candidates who received the survey. At our 10/1 Membership Meeting the TRU voted to endorse Kshama Sawant in her run against Frank Chopp for District 43 State Representative.

Transit Riders Union letter and survey for candidates

Responses so far:

• David Spring (District 5, State Rep. Pos. 2, D)
• Andy Massagli (District 47, State Rep. Pos. 2, R)
• Ross Hunter (District 48, State Rep. Pos. 1, D)
• Mark Mullet (District 5, State Senator, D)
• Brian L. Gunn (State Rep. Pos. 1, D)
• Joe Fitzgibbon (State Rep. Pos. 2, D)
• Jessyn Farrell (State Rep. Pos. 2, D)

Continue reading →

TRU’s Position on a Low Income Reduced Fare

Since our foundation, the Transit Riders Union has been advocating for a Low Income Reduced Fare. This Monday, October 8, the King County Council will consider the following motion:

Proposed Motion No. 2012-0380: A MOTION regarding access to public transportation mobility for low income populations; and the establishment of an advisory committee for mobility as an element of the health and human services safety net to assist in the development of new regional public transportation fare programs.

The TRU applauds this move, and we will work to make sure that such a program is adequate to the need and that the process of qualifying for a low income reduced fare is simple and dignified. At our Membership Meeting last Monday, we approved a paper summarizing what we believe a Low Income Reduced Fare should look like. Here it is (a PDF is here): Continue reading →

Reagan Dunn, one of the two County Councilmembers who opposed the car tab fee last summer, is now advocating for a reconsideration of the elimination of the Ride Free Area:

Here is Mike Lindblom’s post on the Seattle Times website: https://blogs.seattletimes.com/politicsnorthwest/2012/10/05/reagan-dunn-lets-consider-making-downtown-seattle-buses-free-again/

And here is Dunn’s letter to the Mayor and County Executive: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/453826-rfaltr-2.html

Thanks to everyone who came out to the Funeral March for the Ride Free Area on Friday! Here’s the front page of Saturday’s Seattle Times, in case you missed it. Below are a few of the awesome photos taken by Alex Garland. These and others can be found here, and another series by Rick Barry are here. Stay tuned…

Marching with the band: Tubaluba!

Marching with the bus

Unrolling the petition scroll…

County Councilmember and Chair Larry Gossett, receiving our petition

Sign the email petition to County Councilmembers here: https://transitriders.org/rfa_petition/

*** Friday, September 28 ***

Funeral March for the Ride Free Area

Ever get the feeling that riding the bus is taking a bigger bite out of your paycheck than it used to? Well, that’s because it is.

In the mid-1970s, a worker in Seattle making the Federal minimum wage had to work for just over 10 minutes to make enough money to pay for their bus rides to and from work. Today, they’d have to work for over 40 minutes to cover their commute – or, at Washington State’s higher minimum wage, almost 35 minutes.

For low wage workers, the cost of riding public transit has effectively tripled in the past forty years!

You can find a PDF of this report, along with source data, here:
https://transitriders.org/pdf/Working_More_to_Ride_to_Work

Check out the front page of today’s Seattle Times! Here’s the full article. And make sure to buy a copy of Real Change this week – we have an editorial on the second page. And finally, here’s the letter we’re delivering to Councilmembers today:

September 13, 2012

Dear County and City Councilmembers, Mayor, and County Executive: Continue reading →

Save the date! On Friday, September 28, the last day of free rides downtown, the Transit Riders Union is planning a Funeral March to commemorate and protest the elimination of the Ride Free Area. There will be a real brass band, and some other surprises… and we’ll be marching to the County Courthouse to deliver our petition! Wear your best funeral clothes.  Help us spread the word! Facebook event page here.

• 3:00 pm:  Rally at Westlake Park
• 3:30 pm:  March down 3^rd Avenue sidewalk to the County Courthouse
• 4:30 pm:  Petition delivery and march back up 3^rd Avenue

So far we’ve collected over 1,300 signatures on our petition asking the County Council to save the Ride Free Area. We don’t expect them to listen before the end of the month – but afterward, when the negative effects of eliminating the RFA begin to sink in, we may be able to pressure them to reconsider.

Join the Funeral March and show the County Council that transit riders are not ready to say RIP to the RFA!

Sign our email petition if you haven’t already, and share the link: https://transitriders.org/rfa_petition/

This coming Tuesday the Transit Riders Union is hosting a public meeting and workshop on the elimination of the Ride Free Area. We’ll have a few people speaking briefly about the history of the RFA, how and why the decision was made to eliminate it, and what the consequences will be. After that there will be time for questions, comments, and discussion about the next steps we can take.

Join us, and bring a friend!  6:00 – 7:30 pm at the Capitol Hill Public Library meeting room, 425 Harvard Avenue E. (served by Metro routes 8, 60, 49, 10, 11). We’ll have some light refreshments.

Here’s the Facebook event page – and don’t forget to sign our email petition to the County Council!

(This event is not sponsored by the Seattle Public Library.)

Sign the petition

At our Members Meeting last Monday, the Transit Riders Union decided to change course in our campaign around the elimination of the Ride Free Area. Rather than focus our efforts on demanding a better free downtown circulator, we believe the Ride Free Area should be preserved. Here’s what changed our minds:

1. A really good free circulator – a full size bus, arriving frequently, 12 hours per day, seven days per week – would cost almost as much as Metro is expecting to gain by eliminating the Ride Free Area in the first place. The RFA increases mobility for everyone downtown: it’s effective and actually it’s a really good deal.

2. The problems that will result from eliminating the RFA go far beyond the effects on low and no income riders. The increased boarding times downtown are expected to cause a congestion nightmare on 3rd Ave and in the tunnel, resulting in bus delays and longer commute times for everyone. When you add up all our lost time, it’s just not worth it.

So we are doing a petition to tell our County Council Members and County Executive Dow Constantine to reconsider their decision. You can join us on Thursdays throughout August and September, when we’ll be gathering signatures on 3rd Ave (contact us or check our calendar for details). Please send the electronic version of our petition to the County Council and Executive now! You can change the suggested text however you like:

[emailpetition id=”1″]

The Transit Riders Union is gearing up for a campaign around the elimination of the Ride Free Area, details to be hashed out at our upcoming August 6 Membership Meeting. Stay tuned! In the meantime, here is our letter to County and City Council Members:

July 26, 2012

To:
King County Council Members
King County Executive Dow Constantine
Seattle City Council Members
Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn

Dear County and City Council Members, Mayor, and County Executive:

We are writing concerning the impending elimination of the Ride Free Area on September 29, and the plans to introduce a free downtown circulator.

We are writing, first, to register our displeasure at the manner in which the decision to eliminate the Ride Free Area was taken. The RFA has performed admirably in its original purpose of easing congestion and increasing mobility downtown, to the benefit of shoppers, tourists, businesses, and commuters. Since its inception in 1973, numerous human and health services for low income and homeless people have located themselves in and around the RFA, knowing they would be accessible by bus for free. That the decision to destroy this venerable institution should be made, not through a transparent public process and based on a reasoned assessment of how well it is working, but as a hasty concession in the political bargaining over the Congestion Reduction Charge, is wrong.

We understand that Metro expects the elimination of the RFA to result in a net savings of a little over $2 million per year, mainly in new fare box revenue from rides currently taken for free. However, according to Metro’s estimate, 1.7 million rides annually will no longer be taken once the RFA is eliminated, because these people either will choose not to take the bus or cannot afford it. How will they get to where they were going? Presumably some will walk, and others will drive, but many will simply not take the trip: out to lunch, or to the grocery store, or to the clinic, or to visit family or friends. In other words, this additional revenue comes at the cost of a significant loss of mobility. This is a move in the wrong direction: we should be encouraging, not discouraging, the use of public transit. And of course, this loss of mobility is most serious for those who will no longer ride Metro downtown because they have little or no money.

So we are writing, second, to encourage you, our County and City Council Members, Mayor and County Executive, to do whatever is in your power to fund a free downtown circulator that will adequately mitigate the effects of the RFA’s elimination on low income riders. In the view of the Transit Riders Union, a circulator should meet the following conditions:

1. Full size 40-foot coaches.
2. Free of charge and open to everyone.
3. Operates 12 hours per day, 7 days per week.
4. Frequency no less than every 20 minutes.
5. Runs from Jackson to Denny and up to Harborview, routed to serve the low income and disabled housing and resources that are currently served by the RFA.
6. Operated by Metro.

We understand that a circulator program of this scope would cost well over $1 million per year to operate, as well as resulting in a loss of projected farebox revenue, thus greatly reducing the anticipated cost savings of eliminating the RFA. Considering this, and considering the congestion and reliability problems that are also likely to be in store after September 29, not eliminating the Ride Free Area in the first place begins to look like the superior option. It was actually a pretty good deal.

We appreciate whatever steps you can take to move the current circulator plan closer to the standards enumerated above. In the longer term, we encourage you to pursue a regional low-fare and no-fare transit pass program for individuals with low or no income.

Sincerely,

The Transit Riders Union

On September 29, the Ride Free Area in downtown Seattle will be eliminated.

The RFA was established in 1973, the same year that King County Metro began operations. It was originally called the “Magic Carpet Zone”, and it was intended to encourage people to get out of their cars, to help downtown businesses, workers, and tourists, and to relieve traffic congestion.

In the subsequent decades, many health and human services for homeless, disabled, and low income people grew up in and around the RFA, choosing their locations knowing they’d be accessible by bus for free. But three months from now, they won’t be any more.

There was no public process leading up to the decision to eliminate the Ride Free Area. This decision was made by the County Council during negotiations over the $20 car tab fee in summer 2011, and there’s not much we can do about it now. But what isn’t set in stone yet is what the county and the city will do to mitigate the effects.

The Transit Riders Union takes the following position on the elimination of the RFA:

• The elimination of the Ride Free Area on September 29 will place a significant burden on low income riders who currently use the RFA to travel around and through downtown. This includes disabled people, and service and other low wage workers. The elimination of the RFA will make getting around more difficult for all downtown workers, shoppers and tourists, will hurt the businesses that rely on these customers, and will remove an incentive for people to choose public transit over cars. Meanwhile, very poor riders will find their mobility and access to vital services severely curtailed.

• This is unacceptable. It is the shared responsibility of the County and the City to find a solution that adequately mitigates the hardship that the RFA’s elimination will impose, especially on low income and poor riders.

• The county’s current plan, which calls for several small (10-15 passenger) free circulator shuttles operating nine hours per day, five days per week, with service every thirty minutes, is a totally inadequate solution. These shuttles will not effectively serve even the poorest riders; moreover, they will create a second-class ridership of those who cannot afford to take the ‘normal’ buses around downtown.

• In order to constitute an adequate solution, a free downtown circulator should meet the following conditions:

1. Full size 40-foot coaches.
2. Free of charge and open to everyone.
3. Operates 12 hours per day, 7 days per week.
4. Frequency no less than every 20 minutes.
5. Runs from Jackson to Denny and up to Harborview, routed to serve the low income and disabled housing buildings and resources that are currently served by the RFA.
6. Operated by Metro.

Stay tuned for a plan of action!

On Thursday, June 28, the Sound Transit Board will consider a motion that would commit up to $10 million to improve pedestrian and bike access to the future Northgate light rail station; the City of Seattle has agreed to contribute another $10 million. The proposal still includes the construction of a 450-stall parking garage. City of Seattle Council Member Richard Conlin and Mayor Mike McGinn have been working on this proposal, encouraged by public pressure; it isn’t perfect, but it is much better than the original plan!

Thank you to everyone who wrote letters and attended meetings, pressuring the board to spend less money on a bigger-than-needed parking garage and more on making it easier to access the new station by foot, bike and transit. You can send a final message encouraging the board to pass the new proposal here.

The motion will do the following: Continue reading →

***Take Action! Join us in Northgate on Tuesday and Wednesday, and at the Sound Transit Capital Committee meeting at 1:30 pm on Thursday, 6/14. Email contact@transitriders.org for more information.***

by Beau Morton

In 1993 the City of Seattle designated the Northgate area as an urban center. As a developing urban center, it is expected to take much of the job and residential growth in the city over the coming decades. Years of planning and studies have been performed in order to make Northgate a denser, less car dominated, more livable neighborhood centered around low-income housing and transit oriented development. So why is Sound Transit proposing a 600-900 stall, $27-40 million parking garage be built as part of the Link light rail station?

In Sound Transit’s own words “it is not feasible to meet future transit demand at Northgate and achieve land use goals without shifting focus to non-driving access modes such as expanding rail-bus connections and pedestrians and bicycle access.” By Sound Transit’s own numbers, the Northgate Transit Center currently serves more than 5,000 riders each weekday, with 70% of them getting there by transit, foot or bike. By 2030, Sound Transit projects 92% of 15,000 daily weekday riders will get to the station by transit, foot or bike.

Under the terms of the North Link Record of Decision, Sound Transit has to provide “best effort” mitigation for 428 park and ride stalls temporarily lost during construction. After construction is finished, 117 park and ride stalls and 64 other private stalls will have been permanently eliminated. There are many ways Sound Transit can mitigate the temporary loss of parking: leasing additional parking stalls, running shuttles from satellite parking locations, purchasing additional bus service from King County Metro. So why spend up to $40 million on storing cars, while leaving less than $2 million for pedestrian and bike improvements and increased bus service?

In a time of ever rising gas prices, declining incomes and demographic shifts away from driving, mitigating the loss of 181 parking stalls with a permanent 600-900 stall parking garage is the wrong answer. Siting a 600-900 stall parking garage in the middle of what will be dense transit oriented development is the wrong answer. Spending $27-40 million on the 8% of people who will drive while leaving less than $2 million for the 92% who won’t is the wrong answer. Seattle deserves better than a mid-20th century solution to a 21st century problem.

As an organization of working and poor people, the Transit Riders Union opposes the use of taxpayers’ money in such an unfair, inefficient, and wasteful way. We believe Sound Transit should look to the future, heed their own words, and focus their investments on the 92% of people who will get to the station in 2030 by transit, foot or bike.

***You can send a message to Sound Transit from the Cascade Bicycle Club’s blog here.***

by Katie Wilson

On Tuesday, January 10, Governor Gregoire released a 10-year transportation revenue proposal (posted on the Seattle Transit Blog here). Less than 5% of the package is dedicated to transit – not nearly enough, although this should come as no surprise to anyone. Two items bear directly on local public transit:

1. “Grant funding for transit to mitigate potential service cuts to passengers that would affect their ability to get to work, school and other destinations – $150 million”

Direct state funding for public transit is sorely needed; unfortunately this $150 million in grant money is a one-time (not an annual) deal, and would presumably be spread across the state, so the amount that would reach Metro over the next ten years is likely to be rather small.

2. “Either allow local governments the option, through councilmatic [sic] approval, to impose a 1 percent increase in the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax, with proceeds to be dedicated to local road and transit needs, or allow transportation benefit districts the option, through councilmatic approval, to adopt up to a $40 vehicle license fee for local road and transit needs.”

A 1% MVET increase isn’t a great funding tool, but at least it would be more progressive than a flat car tab fee – a welcome reminiscence of the days before Eyman’s Initiative 695. But Martin H. Duke’s post on the Seattle Transit Blog suggests that in King County that 1% would end up going “to address traffic diversion from the tunnel.” And if the $40 VLF were approved, even much of that would likely be consumed at the city level, rather than being funneled to King County Metro.

Which leaves us with… not much.

As politically impossible as it seems right now, it’s worth thinking about some more progressive funding measures we might demand of the state once we have built up the people-power to do so effectively. The Economic Opportunity Institute’s fact sheet, “$2 billion in progressive annual revenue for Washington,” contains several transit-related items. For instance, a state-wide 10% luxury tax on motor vehicles, vessels, and aircraft valued over $50,000 would raise $70 million annually; and repealing the sales tax exemption on trade-ins would raise $114 million. EOI has this to say about trade-ins:

“Trade-ins – When someone trades in a car (or boat or appliance) while purchasing a new one from a dealer, no sales tax is charged on the value of the trade-in. In private party sales of used cars, the purchaser pays sales tax on the purchase price when registering the vehicle. Typically, sellers get a better price by selling a used vehicle themselves, so trading-in is primarily a convenience, and especially benefits those who frequently buy a new car. Eliminating this exemption would primarily affect upper income people. Because a portion of sales tax goes to local governments, eliminating the exemption would provide $35 million in additional revenue to local governments.”

Of course, there’s also no good reason why transit funding should come only from transit-related taxes.